Feature request

The main problem with conventional trailing is that due to the fact that an asset moves in waves, the stop loss gradually pulls up to the current price and is eventually knocked out by a squeeze or even just after a while, with another minor correction. In my opinion, it would be convenient if trailing was automatically recalculated based on the asset's volatility, rather than just a percentage distance from the current price. The options that could be managed are: Multiplier The range of candlesticks to count as ATR Updating the stop loss level when the candle closes in the selected timeframe It is considered simple; Tradingview has many stop loss implementations on ATR. https://www.incrediblecharts.com/indicators/atr_average_true_range_trailing_stops .php

Currently, when the “Activation in BU” function is enabled when the TP price is reached, SL moves to the entry point, taking into account commissions. However, I suggest defining the concepts of breakeven, profit and loss. • Breakeven is the price at which a position is closed and the trade's PNL fluctuates around $0. Since SL is a stop market order, it is impossible to calculate a price at which the actual result is =0. This would be a value around 0. • Profit is a positive result of a deal. • A loss is a negative result of a trade. If TP is reached, where part of the volume is closed, then transferring a StopLoss order above the entry point is not breakeven by definition. This is a profit, because PNL will actually be equal to TP minus the commission, so profits sold via TP will be protected. In this case, the difference between the current sale of the BU and the real place of the BU is too large, because due to volatility, the current BU will be close to the last price, which means that the SL order is likely to be triggered. The strategic point of transferring an SL order to a true breakeven price is that if the price reaches TP, it is likely that the price will continue to move until the next TP. At the same time, if the first goal has already been achieved, it is advisable to protect the position from loss. But on top of that, the SL order should be in a relatively safe place so that it is less likely to be absorbed by volatility. This is where breakeven helps, because if you close, for example, 50% of the volume at the first target, the breakeven will be somewhere in the middle between the entry point and SL, which is far enough from the last price at the time of TP's closing. Breakeven price = balance of funds invested in the position/remaining number of contracts — 3 commissions (entry, TP, future SL-Taker) Fortunately, you can update SL based on a signal from TradingView, so we've implemented breakeven using the SL module and the “Update signal settings” function enabled. But this requires additional features in the TV strategy and is being implemented quite confusingly) I would like to one day reduce the number of TV signals to the only one that opens a position.

Set the SL trigger price to be activated at the specific instrument price, not in%, since the position price may change during the process due to funding or averaging orders, so% is not calculated correctly and SLX may not work. If you gain a position with 2 or more pending orders, it is not possible to calculate this percentage in advance at the stage of opening a position, and thus some of the automation of the process is lost. Maybe not remove% completely, but do it as an alternative. Thanks! You are the best terminal in the world!!!

Add to the module the ability to activate trailing at an exact price. And a visual display in the terminal (a line that will show the same data as in the SL and TP blocks). Because this is also, in fact, a trigger price. Why couldn't it be implemented right away? This option is available in the SL and TP modules. And the deviation from the trigger price and the minimum rearrangement step already remains as a percentage. Why do you need this: Firstly, when buying a market from a signal, the breakeven price will differ, since in the tradingview strategy, a signal with the market buy price is generated when the bar closes. Hence, the signal output from the position, the percentage that is transferred, will differ. In one case, trailing activation will be lower if the market bought below the price sent with tradingview. Otherwise, it is higher if the market is purchased above the price sent from tradingview. This will lead to the fact that the position may not close, but then go into the red. Secondly, the percentage adjusts the activation of trailing due to mintick, since in the strategy, for example, interest is also calculated by rounding the trading instrument with the math.round_to_mintick function. This is noticeable every time a percentage is sent to the module, for example, 2.67, and set to 2.68 or higher in the terminal. As a result, even if a position is opened at the wrong price, higher or lower than the required price, this will eventually lead to a 100% closure of the position when the activation price is reached.

It is not clear under what conditions the trailing stop works. The SLX signals establish that the stop loss activation at breakeven is activated after the 1.1% pnl is reached and only then is the stop loss position opened with an indent of 0.2%. In fact, when the order is active, when the price fluctuates, an order is opened that the system recognizes as a trailing stop loss and closes the position

For example 2 trades are allowed at a time, but there are two TPs and after the first one SL is set to profit or used, that is, we are all already profitable, and in this case this deal is considered closed and new ones may be opened. This function will be enabled after the control unit is activated.

Good time dear Finandy and terminal users! I think it would be nice to add a display function to the SLX data (parameter) graph. And enable/disable the display of this option in the terminal settings. For example, I set the activation to 3% with a deviation of 1% and a min. permutation step of 0.2%. I would like to see this on the graph in the form of a line from breakeven or average, excluding funding, next to which will be written about 1%, w. 0.2%, and possibly other parameters. And so that it is possible to move this line, thereby changing the activation percentage.

Good time Finandy. Please choose where to place the SLX stop loss mole after the conditions are met. Now you have only one choice: “Activate in the BU”, but in fact, this is not breakeven, but setting it to the middle login or login. And I would like to choose between: 1) A real used one that changes when take profits are reached, funding changes, commissions, and volume is added. 2) To medium (to enter a position).